New York Times writer Hank Klibinoff explores the effect of modern technology on photojournalism in his recent piece “What The Still Photo Does Best”
Hank highlights how common it has become for a nonprofessional photograph to get attention.
I really liked the point made towards the end of the piece that a photojournalist’s mission includes documenting injustice. To me this is case and point why citizen photojournalism will never replace professional photojournalism. The motivation is different and there are some photographs you must set out to get. It seems unlikely that anyone would accidentally take photos of tortured prisoners or crooked politicians.
Although I don’t believe that photojournalist are being replaced I can’t help feeling excited about the possibility of being able to capture a great moment using the video frames technique demonstrated in our in class video by David Leeson.
Simple though it may seem I have a suspicion that not everyone could pull this off either. You still need a lot of expensive equipment, software, and most importantly an eye for what looks good. In fact you need the same good aesthetic sense that a photographer would need to pick the right angle, lighting, and moment. The photographer is simply at greater risk of missing the moment.
Today, everyone with a cellphone is a photographer/videographer and streaming video has become a national obsession. But has the proliferation of images devalued photojournalism and dulled its influence?